Template talk:Toho Monsters: Difference between revisions
From Wikizilla, the kaiju encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "== Legendary kaiju == If this is a navbox for Toho kaiju, then why are the Mutos included in it? Both Mutos were created by Legendary and are trademarked by Legendary as far a...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If this is a navbox for Toho kaiju, then why are the Mutos included in it? Both Mutos were created by Legendary and are trademarked by Legendary as far as I am aware. Are they only in the navbox because they are part of the MonsterVerse? In that case, shouldn't the Skullcrawlers and all of the other monsters from Skull Island be in there too? It would make sense considering we also have Kong in the navbox and he isn't a Toho kaiju either. ~[[User:Deathrock9|Deathrock9]] ([[User talk:Deathrock9|talk]]) 13:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
If this is a navbox for Toho kaiju, then why are the Mutos included in it? Both Mutos were created by Legendary and are trademarked by Legendary as far as I am aware. Are they only in the navbox because they are part of the MonsterVerse? In that case, shouldn't the Skullcrawlers and all of the other monsters from Skull Island be in there too? It would make sense considering we also have Kong in the navbox and he isn't a Toho kaiju either. ~[[User:Deathrock9|Deathrock9]] ([[User talk:Deathrock9|talk]]) 13:44 12 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:44, 12 March 2017
If this is a navbox for Toho kaiju, then why are the Mutos included in it? Both Mutos were created by Legendary and are trademarked by Legendary as far as I am aware. Are they only in the navbox because they are part of the MonsterVerse? In that case, shouldn't the Skullcrawlers and all of the other monsters from Skull Island be in there too? It would make sense considering we also have Kong in the navbox and he isn't a Toho kaiju either. ~Deathrock9 (talk) 13:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
