What's wrong with the edits I did now?
First of all Godzilla Raids Again did happen six months later and into the following year after Godzilla That's a fact.
Second, what's wrong with "...from the inside out..."? Everyone says that.
Third, Godzilla and the Lost Continent was the fifth and final novel in Cerasini's series; that's just to separate it from Ciencin's series.
So can these three please get reinserted?
You are adding unnecessary clarification and making things more long-winded than they need to be. These edits are not adding any important or useful information, they're just rephrasing things and making sentences longer without adding anything worthwhile. We've been asking you to stop making these edits in the past, but you keep doing them even after we remove them, then complain about it on our walls when we remove them again. This is an ongoing cycle that seems to never end because you refuse to listen to our feedback and continue to make the same edits and get upset at us for contesting them.
I will make this as clear as possible: Your edits keep being reverted because you are simply overcomplicating or rewording things in some attempt to make them sound more "distinguished," which serves no real beneficial purpose. Almost none of your edits consist of adding new information, they're just rephrasing what is already there. Sometimes you may correct a grammatical or syntax mistake, but a lot of the time you're just making things sound more long-winded and wordy, or changing something that is fine as it as already worded, seemingly just for the sake of changing it. I'm losing my patience because I keep having to comb through your edits and figure out what to keep and what to remove, then when I'm done I can expect you to leave an angry message on my wall, forcing me to explain my reasoning, which is pretty much the same every time.
You goofed on one of them. In the Godzilla: Second Generation section in the part on DAM, it said "..., they Godzilla to attack New York City." The word "sent" was one I put in there, then you removed it, so I had to put it back just now. I've got you right there. You goofed this time, not me. I saw it and you didn't. I was right and you were wrong. All of which just goes to show that even your judgments are not infallable.
And you may notice, btw, that I haven't even touched contractions anymore.
And I'm not giving you angry messages; I'm trying to explain things. And I'm not trying to be "distinguished" at all; just presenting facts that I know, like everyone else does here.
I'm sorry, but proclaiming "You goofed this time, not me. I saw it and you didn't. I was right and you were wrong. All of which just goes to show that even your judgments are not infallable" over a small oversight makes you sound really pompous and smug, and it makes the claim that you're "not giving you angry messages" fall apart. Even King's noted that he usually reverts all your edits, then goes through to find the good ones, because it's easier to do that than hunt through all your tiny edits. This doesn't disprove anything, he already knows this.
