Topic on User talk:El spigre

I reverted your recent content removal. Would you please let admins to decide what can stay on articles? As long as admins decide to remove, I have no problems.

For a reference, I share this story. Previously, there was such a non-admin editor who consistently tried to delete contents based on his own judgments, and had engaged in multiple edit-warrings. One (or more ) of my edit(s) deleted by him back then were eventually approved by admins, and I was also temporarily blocked due to edit wars against him (both of us were temporarily blocked at the same time). This user was eventually blocked infinity due to his endless disputes with other editors and his block evasion.

My apology for giving a side story, but I strongly object non-admins using their own judgments to delete contents without consensuses. We should let admins to decide what can and can not stay on articles.

The disclaimer when you edit says, "Please note that all contributions to Wikizilla may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors." If you disagree with an item's removal, you can make a case for it in conversation with a regular user the same as you would for us. The problem with you and Zillaman, as I remember, was that those conversations happened in edit summaries while you were both hammering the undo button, which is unproductive and just ratchets up tension.