Topic on User talk:Kaiju No. 14

From Wikizilla, the kaiju encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
TheCarlosfieldParadox (talkcontribs)

Thx for helping me out with Tagruato! I think I finished and I put references.

Kaiju No. 14 (talkcontribs)

the still needs help? yes i'll help.

TheCarlosfieldParadox (talkcontribs)

Yeh, @The H-Man keps sayin that I keep plagarizing even tho I tried very hard and there is not a lot of info on this company.

Kaiju No. 14 (talkcontribs)
Kaiju No. 14 (talkcontribs)

it appears to be 100% Unique

TheCarlosfieldParadox (talkcontribs)

Yeah, so why call it plagarisism. @The H-Man is completely wrong!

Kaiju No. 14 (talkcontribs)

he reads familiar text and calls it plagarisism.

The H-Man (talkcontribs)

It is still plagiarized.


This is the first sentence of TheCarlosfieldParadox's submission:

>>"The main focus of Tagruato Corporation is deep sea drilling, specifically for Petroleum."


This is the first sentence of the section from Cloverfield Clues:

>>"The main focus of Tagruato Corporation is deep sea drilling, specifically for petroleum:"


That is WORD FOR WORD the same thing, aka textbook plagiarism. In fact, if you plug that sentence into the Grammarly link Kaiju No. 14 supplied, the result it comes back with is "100% plagiarized." If you plug in the entire history section (and remove the [1] cite note), it still comes back 71% plagiarized.


Once again, changing a few words does not constitute original writing. The history section on the Tagruato page here is still clearly derived from the Cloverfield Clues blog. That's plagiarism, guys. Plagiarism, as defined by Oxford: "the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own."


And frankly, Kaiju No. 14, you have been banned and warned multiple times for plagiarism: you have no room to tell me I'm wrong about spotting plagiarism.

TheCarlosfieldParadox (talkcontribs)

So, If I put a referance on that it is not plagarisism? bc I did.

The H-Man (talkcontribs)

That doesn't change the fact it's plagiarized. As I said in your other topic, and as stated in the site's Plagiarism page, "citing a plagiarized source as a reference does not mean the content is not plagiarized."

The current version of your page looks better, but the syntax and grammar could stand some work. "What the Tagruato Corporation does is mainly deep sea drilling" and "The company started to get sick of just drilling for Petroleum" sound too colloquial, but those can be easily fixed. For future reference, familiarize yourself with the Syntax guide.

Kaiju No. 14 (talkcontribs)

why?