I don't mean to sound confrontational, but can you explain why you reverted my edit? There's currently little to no information about the Kraken's background.
User talk:Zillaman98
From Wikizilla, the kaiju encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The show literally shows it waking up from kongs blood that counts as an origin.
I don't believe that counts. By that logic, we might as well add information about Emma using the Orca to wake up Ghidorah in KOTM to the MV Ghidorah's article, for example.
It literally does count
We have several origin sections for monsters with vague backgrounds
I'm not denying that there articles with vague origin sections like that. However, I don't see how this is supposed to count as such. It's just how the Kraken woke up. From what I've seen, the origin section in articles tend to talk more about how the monster was created, not woken up. It just feels unnecessary to have it in this case.
With what little we know it counts..https://wikizilla.org/wiki/Behemoth#Origins
https://wikizilla.org/wiki/Alien_spaceship_(10_Cloverfield_Lane)#Origins
https://wikizilla.org/wiki/Scylla#Origins
https://wikizilla.org/wiki/Zedus#Origins
I feel like the most comparable of all of those articles is the Alien spaceship's, since the others talk about either where they were discovered or how they came to be. In any case, the Alien spaceship's origin section is indeed vague, but it doesn't really talk about them waking up.
Would you say it's reasonable to remove the origins section?
No
For the "Godzilla Earth" page, you had undone one of my edits. I had seen the name appear before, but don't know how to add a reference. Could you do it?
Here's the link: Bandai America#Shokugan .282014 and 2019.29
Sorry if this is too tedious for you, or if I'm causing any problems.
I added it
Is it alright if I add to your sandboxes?
Thats what its for
Thank you! Sorry if we got off the wrong foot, it's nice to meet you! :)
Im honestly not sure what you mean sorry.
I thought you were upset at me when we first spoke because you thought my edits were counterproductive.
Please don't think I'm defending the Neo Monster Island guy. I stumbled onto that site when I was way too young and I mostly try to forget about it.
aye sorry i wasnt trying to assume anything
im sorry if that caused you any trauma
Oh, nothing that bad. Weird to think about in retrospect though. It wasn't difficult to find; a lot of kaiju fansites just blithely linked to it (back when there still were a lot of kaiju fansites).
I don't think I've formally introduced myself. I've been on here for a while. Nice to meet you.
The death jackals are stated to be mammals, so wouldn't it be accurate to label them as reptile-like mammals or reptilian mammals or something similar?
they are not stated to be mammals they are only implied to be related to mammals
I remembered their origins previously said that they were related to canids despite resembling reptiles, and were therefore mammals.
Could you please tell me what's wrong with "a la Gamera" and "a la Gyaos"? I don't see anything wrong with that.
Seems like a meaningless distinction either way.
could you please be so kind as to tell me where is this stated? Is it in rules or such? I think it could speed up the Sandbox and get it done the better without the need to find that much free time or find ways to adhere to the Wiki's paragraph rules. It can all be simply given to the AI to do it for people at the shortest amount of time and retouching. I wish to know where does it state it isn't allowed or why it shouldn't be?
one of the admins frowned upon it and this hasnt been addressed by the rules because nothing like this has happened until now but i don't think they want this.
"It hasn't come up before, though I guess it was only a matter of time. I'd much rather see the version the user wrote before the GPT changes."
plus its really painfully obvious it was written by AI and that's just lazy.
AI is not helpful with specific information like Development or describing specific Designs.
uh...i never used it to explain development or designs? I gave it a sypnosis of the plot to analyze the Personality of the characters, and then i retouched it and added some certain details. I don't understand why the older version is considered better, didn't you say my phrasing was subpar and such? Could it be discussed with other admins to see what they think? Because this could be used for specific things that need analysis, like, again, Personality sections. It doesn't need to be for everything, but things that require observation. GPT doesn't have eyes to describe images nor it can look on the internet (that i know of), to make a development page. I just thought it was the best tool for that one section. I think my attempts aren't as good as the way the AI writes them.
No those were examples of why it shouldnt be used.
and i dont recall ever stating that i recall saying a lot of what you put in a personality section should of just been put in the history section.
i guess i'll wait until the admins come to a conclusion to sort it out, then. I been busy so i honestly thought that'd save me time and give a better structured analysis. Got not much to say but hope for the best.
Factually, artificial intelligence, doesn't even know half of exactly what you wish it to write or describe most of the time. As this is an encyclopedia (which relies on fact rather fiction/something a robot wrote for you which you provided a description for it to write information which it uses unknown random sources), its better if you just write things yourself, you know.
well, could i bring up what it wrote, to see if it can be judged? I could try to rewrite it a bit according to what could be problems instead of just deleted without thought. I think it did a good job, so this is very weird to me. Like, did it write anything factually false? That and, again, i realized i been struggling with writing like the paragraphs the wiki wants, so i thought it'd do a way better job than me. or i could even ask it to adhere to those parameters.
Yeah it was entirely wrong about a section on Zarab.
"Additionally, Alien Zarab considers humans to be a dangerous and unorganized species that breeds unnecessarily. This statement suggests that he sees humans as a threat or disruptive force to the overall balance of the ecosystem or the universe."
I dont recall him caring about the ecosystem at all.
alright, why not point that out for me to remove? or you could remove that section. Even if it is speculative i don't think that warrants a full deletion. It seems simpler to excise the mistakes. You did that before with some of my edits.
The Wiki has anti Plagarism rules and frankly i feel this is a form of Plagarism.
ok, how is it plagiarism? If it being AI is banned/non-rule compliant then that could be reason enough. But some of these reasons don't seem very objective. plagiarism denotes it was stolen from someone, a living person, i just gave it a resume of the actions of the characters to construct a analysis for me to use. It created something new, unless you mean the AI is a person and it should edit itself? Again, if you people just want to say, it is a new editing rule to not use AI, that'd be the end of it. All i say, is that this is a bit of the opposite of progress to finishing the sandbox, but that is simply my opinion. but if things are "no is no" situation, i'll drop it. Even if it is incredibly confusing.
Ai poorly writes existing information written online, this can be called "AIgiarism".
You seem fine typing these pretty lengthy response messages so im honestly little confused as to why you even Need AI if thats the case.
The wiki always wants users to put it in their own words hence the plagarism rule which i imagine should expand to this.
I think we need to bring it up to an admin so an anti-AI rule can be put in the policy.
alright, case closed i suppose. No need to do petty jabs to people, just trying to see what is the problem.
Why exactly it wouldn't be allowed? It's a piece of merch that includes King Kong and The Kraken, it should be mention it.
Hey, I was wondering if you could tell me how to edit templates.
i already did it
but i go under find templates used for the page and find it.
