User talk:The King of the Monsters

The King of the Monsters

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:The King of the Monsters/Archive 2 on 2019-04-29.

I put in 2 hours of my hard work and even though the grammar was bad you could have fix if bad grammar was not tolerated so why you deleted it instead of fixing it? If bad grammar was not tolerated FIX IT NOT DELETE IT ALL!?!

If you want to more then go ahead I know it isn't deleted because it's unrelated because it definitely have enough convincing evidence to put it on Godzilla in popular culture

First of all, chill out. There’s no need to get pissed at Admins when they have good and justified reasons to revert edits/delete contributions.

And Second, it probably would’ve been better if you presented your work to Admins before adding it to a page.

I worked over two hours on it so I can't get over it imminently also I had my entire wikipage flooded with the references ready to be showed Here's to it if you're interested though. It's incomplete because there is a ton of Godzilla references in Turbo Fast. he Epic Tales of Captain Underpants, and Johnny Test

Dude calm down! KOTM only deletes stuff for a good reason, you just got to trust him. ( Don’t bother replying KOTM, he’s not worth responding too right now).

I know but i worked over two our finds all the stuff to add to Godzilla in popular culture I even got my wiki page filled up with all those things ready to be in Godzilla in popular culture and I still got more references to Godzilla to go

I finished giving a more detailed account of Kong’s scenes in the film in the Kong profile on your Sandbox. It’s ready for revision whenever your ready.

I’ve recently watched King Kong 1933 and Son of Kong and I was wondering if I could help you expand the profiles for Kong 33 and Kiko with the movies more fresh in my head.

You can edit whatever pages you want, but I don't recommend summarizing movies from memory, no matter how recently you watched them.

Okay, I thought I should ask permission since they were in his sandbox.

What about KOTM though? I’m worried about the empty pages and I don’t want you guys to have to do all the work, but it’s been so long since I’ve seen it now.

Thank you for re-editing my post for Ghidorah Monsterverse personality. You forgot one thing though. Do you want me to tell you about that?

Never mind. It has been taken care of.

Is supposed that the Boosted form product of the nuclear warhead explosion to powerup Godzilla is taller, heavier and more powerful.

Also Fire Godzilla is another powerup a transformation into a burning-like Godzilla.

Because calling them "forms" is a little bit of a loosely used term here for Godzilla just being given boosts in power and you just made up names for them. If and when they are officially acknowledged in a source and given names, we will add them.

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11118/111182371/6962212-answer3.png

https://news.toyark.com/2019/01/10/godzilla-king-of-the-monsters-jakks-pacific-toys-revealed-via-new-toy-listings-spoilers-328985

People and some websites have used the "Fire Godzilla" name for Godzilla's symbiotic state with Mothra's energy but it has not yet been used officially. Dougherty even says it's a temporary effect of Godzilla's symbiosis with Mothra and not really a form. If "Fire Godzilla" is ever used officially, we will add it.

We have a list of corresponding names for the Jakks figures and it has been revealed that the name for this Burning Godzilla is actually referred to as Fire Godzilla:

Also Mike agrees with the name "Fire Godzilla" as shown in the scan. He could have said "hey that is not his name" or something but at the end he accepts it.

Many other sites have used Fire Godzilla as his name., here some examples.

Random news and toy sites using the name does not make it official. Dougherty didn't even acknowledge the name, he just understood what the Twitter post was trying to say and answered accordingly. It's not a distinguished form, and the name is not official. It's not getting added.

Ok if I find more information I will tell you about it.

Differences between Burning G and Fire G, in a nutshell:

Burning G = Supercharged G + WAY TOO MUCH nuclear energy + completely uncontrollable (= eminently explosive/meltdown-based death) + somehow still dying, despite Destoroyah having absorbed some energy (?!SERIOUSLY, HOW?!)

Fire G = controllable Burning G = supercharged Alpha Predator G + a little too much nuclear energy + Energy Transfer from Mothra (ergo, controlled/weaponized [= no death]) + can wear off via overpowered, Mothra-enhanced Nuclear Pulses

I'm back, according the novelization of the film the Post-nuke revival Godzilla is officially called as "Supercharged Godzilla", as I'm reading it recently I have not reached the Burning-like Godzilla form but for sure "Fire Godzilla" is not mentioned.

The quote is "Between their missiles and a supercharged Godzilla," it's just a description of Godzilla after the nuclear blast "supercharged" him, it's not presented as a name for a "form" of Godzilla or anything.

Ok I'll look for more information.

In which book or where was mentioned that GMK Godzilla is an entity created from a combination of the restless souls??

In my Toho Special Effects Movie Complete Works book it says that GMK is a real Godzilla, another one from the first appeared in 1954. Basically another member of the Godzilla species, but no mention about had been spawned by souls.

Thanks in advance.

It's directly stated in the movie.

Maybe you have a different translation, on my movie the old man states godzilla's body is a vessel for restless souls. As I readed here, he was "created" due the amalgamation of souls.

So I wanna know which translation is the correct one. Thanks

The restless souls are amalgamated within Godzilla, the vessel. He's still an atomic prehistoric monster like the 1954 Godzilla, but the reason he is attacking Japan and acts the way he is is because he is a malicious entity that is the vessel for the amalgamation of restless souls. Our page even makes this clear. It's just different ways to word the same thing.

Ok. thanks maybe I was confused with the "creation stament" in the GMK page.

Two questions: 1. Why did you delete the paragraphs regarding Godzilla showing anger? Is it cause that’s standard fare for a Godzilla movie? 2. Why did you delete the part where I said Godzilla might not be on humanity’s side forever? Someone put that in the Heisei Gamera article, and the same thing is talked about by the characters in the film.

Pls delete ASAP: https://wikizilla.org/wiki/Special:WikiForum/Godzilla_King_Of_The_Monsters_Live_Movie_2019

Meesmoth (talk) 07:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

It's taken care of.

Was there spoilers in that link?

It was a link to supposedly a torrent of the movie, it probably would just lead to a ton of viruses if someone clicked it.

Hello, I remember putting a comment on your old talk page asking why the comments don't show up on some pages, and you told me that all I need to do is click edit and then save it and then the comments will show up again. It worked initially but now it won't work unless I actually edit the article. What should I do for articles which seem complete and I don't want to mess with anything.

Click the timer in the top right corner of the screen. It should reload the page, and thus the comments.

I wanna know why you removed the picture of the nuclear pulse on MonsterVerse's Godzilla page?

Because it's a low-quality photograph of the comic page. We can only add high-quality scans to the page, of which there are not any available at the moment.

Ok seems fair then.

Why did you delete the trivia I put? I’m just wondering so I can learn for next time.

Never mind I saw the statement you put when I went to changes. It makes sense. From now on I won’t put speculation in the trivia.