Wasn't this game supposed to come out this year?
Because I found this:
Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Les/Archive 1 on 2019-04-29.
Wasn't this game supposed to come out this year?
Because I found this:
I don't understand the relevance of the screenshot? Anyway, the Kickstarter for Isle of the Damned has said from the start, as far as I'm aware, that it's coming out next year. The Kong: Skull Island Cinematic Adventure, however, was released earlier this year.
so uh why do you keep moving the George sandbox to a page when the Rathalos (and the cat for that matter) have far more written about it than George himself
His history section is nowhere near presentable and doesn't even have an origin section yet you said the Rathalos wasn't presentable??????
I don't remember anymore, but I don't think Rathalos' problem was lack of content, but the quality of what was written. George's history could be expanded, but everything is solidly written. I don't see the point in keeping it as a sandbox because of one section. The Cat needed/needs a lot more than that too.
here it is
im not sure what else should be done for it
also K14 pretty much found every bit of info possible for the Cat and we have movie pages i think there's movie pages even less than the cat so what more does it need?
When The Cat was moved, it had less sources, was missing the Production and Theatrical releases sections, and Reception was less detailed. It's in a better state now, but the Plot is mainly what needs to be looked at. I haven't had the time or motivation.
My best effort has gone into writing and fixing up the plot section. Should I move the page once the section has been approved by you or another admin?
but didn't you say the wanigon vs gamaron plot needed cleanup?
ABB did that when he made the page.
weird the plot looks the same to me.
This is what it used to look like. It was one giant run-on sentence.
oh crap i didnt noticed i didnt put periods in it
I want to know how to change my user name, could you help me, please?
Sure, what do you want your new name to be?
Thanks in advance!
Unfortunately that name is already taken: https://wikizilla.org/wiki/User:Legendary_Godzilla
Can you try "Legendary Godzilla 95", please?
what exactly is the issue with the spirit tiger image?
its official artwork and its a much better image than the image it had originally plus its basically the final design anyway even if its from a game that isn't even out yet but when has that stopped us from adding stuff that hasnt been released before?
as for the sirenjaw are you sure its not from a campaign expansion addon to the tabletop game? the current game has a campaign with a name as well
i really don't understand why you really are hesitant with adding any of this stuff.
The point is that, until they're published, these are essentially concept art. With Spirit Tiger, I don't expect the design to change, but they might not even use that piece of art in the book. I again point to this Snarehunter piece which was massively reworked into this. We've never used concept art in an infobox unless it's for something scrapped. Right now Kingdom Kong is the Sprit Tiger's most recent appearance.
The Sirenjaw is the same deal, but with an even higher probability of being reworked, since they're depicting a part of his body that's never been shown before. You're treating conceptual images as though they are finalized art, which they're not. I don't see what's so hard about just waiting for the game to come out.
What I got from the Kickstarter is that it's a separate book with a brand-new campaign. It doesn't really sound like an "expansion", they're treating it as a new project.
i feel with monsters only ever seen in drawn form exceptions should be made honestly the comic panels don't look very good as a main image at all personally
if its even not the finalized piece of art that ends up being used i still thought it was an acceptable image for an infobox for the time being.
the artstyle of the sirenjaws image looks to be in the same style as the other finalized pieces of art we got(the early Valkyrie art doesn't quite seem to be the same artstyle) where is it said that its just a concept?
i changed the Death Jackal image was also changed to its artwork from the game simply because its a visually better image for the creature.
Methuselahs page uses lineart from the Dominion comic for it's infobox image on the basis that it shown more.
also why are we waiting for it to come out when info for various other things that haven't came out been added to the site before?
another few examples are what about the Renders of various other monsters?
The images for Kong are a render from a poster and a concept model of his finalized Kong Skull island design
another example is the Alien Craft from 10 Cloverfield lane using a render of its final model because we never get a clear shot of it in the film wouldn't that count as using "concept art"?
i don't think its recent appearance should have any bearing on it's infobox image but rather clarity of an image should (specifically for monsters whos designs do not change)
I never said there was anything wrong with using illustrations. But those pieces are from PUBLISHED books. We know they're final because you can physically see them there in the book. Who knows how far away we are from seeing this next RPG published; anything can happen from then til now.
It doesn't need to be "said" that they're concepts. The blog post where the Snarehunter pic was posted made no indication of whether that picture was final or not, but we can tell that it wasn't because it's not in the book. We have no way to verify these images are in the new RPG because it doesn't exist yet. If they don't show up, or show up in altered form, then they would be concept art. And until it's proven that they are in the book, I think it's fine to call them that.
They was given the megafauna class but the actual discription puts them in florafauna
Sirenjaws profile calls it a florafauna and Sker Buffalos Profile mentions plant characteristics.
what should be done about this?
I did some rejiggering. They don't make these things easy, do they?
The spirit tiger page calls it it florafauna but i dont know if it even has a profile.
Also what about the sub divisions and the non cryptozoological classifications
I feel those need to be added to infoboxes too.
Also the Spirit tiger is still called Icarus Tigris in the Kong skull island template
i also have a question
what should we do about the Monsters that are not currently classified as either Titan or Superspecies should that have its own Unclassified monsters category?
Where exactly did you get Megabubalis skerryfer from even?
i looked it up on the web and all i found was it led back to the Wikizilla page for the Sker Buffalo no source was ever cited for it
Im pretty sure its styleized as MonsterVerse why did that change?
It's been pretty universally "Monsterverse" for years, including in the listings for Monsterverse Titanthology Vol 1 and the Monsterverse Omnibus and on https://monsterverse.com. We'd been clinging to the camelCase because it was what was used originally, but at this point it just feels inaccurate.
The V on both of those book covers is capitalized though its clearly a stylized logo thing they are doing. It should be mentioned at least its stylized as such.
That's how the logo is, sure, but that's not how it's spelled officially.
i legitimately cannot find anything else on this film at all
and that's quite literally the entire plot I'm not sure what else there is to even do.
EDIT something was found https://www.google.co.nz/books/edition/%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E6%98%AD%E5%92%8C%E3%83%88%E3%83%B3%E3%83%87%E3%83%A2%E6%80%AA%E7%8D%A3%E5%A4%A7%E5%85%A8/7I8lEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%E3%83%AF%E3%83%8B%E3%82%B4%E3%83%B3%E6%B5%B7%E5%BA%95%E6%80%AA%E7%8D%A3%E5%AF%BE%E3%82%AC%E3%83%9E%E3%83%AD%E3%83%B3&pg=PA70&printsec=frontcover
The entire film is on youtube.
Thats literally not what the problem is considering i watched the film.
I wrote a plot and added every bit of info i could possibly find and it still wasnt enough.
And i was given no elaboration as to why it was moved back other than "not ready"
I asked about it and i dont get any answer
It severely needs to be rewritten; the plot is not presentable and the information about the companies is not accurate.
And there is info out there about the toys. The Nitto model kits were first released in 1966.
So if you know more than me can i ask for help then??
The plot is the best to my writting ability so your free to rewrite it to however seems fit.
I couldnt find any information at all about the film itself and i looked in japanese too.
I swear hearing the film was released with vinyl toys in the 2000s but cant find anything
Also the companies are what was listed in the opening credits.
I hope you are safe, would you please do me a favor? Could you share with me the pics of the new Monsters from "Kong: Skull Island Cinematic Adventure (2023)"? I'm curious about what they look like and I promise not to share them on Wikizilla due to respect for the makers of the game. If you prefer we could talk about this in Discord if you have an account there.
Thank you for your attention.
Unfortunately the only new monsters that are pictured are the Snarehunters and Shocker Squids. Here's the image of the latter:
Thank you so much! I appreciate this a lot.
Too bad the other monsters don't have official pics, maybe we could see them in the Skull Island anime if it's released someday.
I assume we dont have any pics of the other snarehunters?
The three in their gallery are all that there is.
Could you show me pics of the human characters, please? Someone told me there is a human with a wolf and another one with a Minigun.
I've not read through the campaign yet so that could be true, but they aren't pictured. The only human characters that have images are the Field Researcher, Monster Hunter, a naval commander named Jericho Daniels, a woman wearing a baseball cap, Houston Brooks, and Aaron Brooks.
Can I see them, please?
Thank you! :D
they are doing a kickstarter for another campaign in the game and we got even More monsters in it now and art showing a sirenjaws full body.
How is fundraising for the project going?
They funded the basic product only 45 minutes after launch.
are we sure the Muto queen is a titan even?
EDIT mainly asking because it seemed only the female was classified as Titanus Muto
Well both 2014 ones are definitely Titans. In the government hearing, Sam starts off, "Godzilla, the MUTOs, Kong. We believe that these 'Titans' and others like them..." Also the KOTM novelization has the line, "With the exception of the MUTOs that Godzilla duked it out with in San Francisco, no two known Titans looked alike."
As for the Queen, I think she hasn't technically ever been called a Titan, but that certainly seems like the implication. Closest thing is probably Dougherty calling her "Titanus Barb." I realize Doug has been jokingly called Titanus Doug, but Dougherty was the one who invented Titans, so. I think it's fine.
The Doug shirt does call him a Vile Vortex Titan so should that be under the Ambiguous titans section?
BTW where is Titanus Barb from i wanted to add it under alternate names
#TitanusBarb was a hashtag on his Instagram post of the model turnaround.