Not editable
The King of the Monsters
Previous discussion was archived at User talk:The King of the Monsters/Archive 2 on 2019-04-29.
I did something like five Godzilla films. The monsters became the stars, and the human characters were put into the background. The human story was cut down. The original one is director Honda's. The original is the only one that's successful, that's really good. I give all of my Godzilla films a minus score.
Is he trying to say that his Godzilla movies played the opposite, that the humans are the stars and the monsters are background?
My understanding is that he's just saying Gojira was a good movie and his were bad.
What!, that's not good. That'll be insulting to the franchise, it would be better if Ishiro Honda returned to direct all of the Godzilla movies.
Fukuda believed that Godzilla (1954) should have stood alone and never spawned any sequels.
Stuart Galbraith IV and Steve Ryfle both kinda convinced him that his Godzilla movies weren't as bad as he claimed.
Can you please change the name of this page Hell Gate Guardian to God Demon?
God Demon is its OFFICIAL name, I added the proof to the profile's reference list already.
Thanks in advance!
I saw you live in Ohio. I live in Ohio too! What part do you live in? I live in Cuyahoga.
Why revert the edits of Godzilla: Awakening being mentioned in the beginning summary if Godzilla: Aftershock was mentioned in the beginning summary as well?
I have a question, am I able to make pages on other monsters beyond Toho like the Graboids from Tremors for example?
Tremors is a no. That doesn't really have anything to do with kaiju.
how will it look like if you revisited the 1998 film,2014 film,Shin Godzilla, Godzilla 2000 Millennium and the 1954 film?
Your relentless demands that people answer this essay question do not, I think, make them any more inclined to answer it.
If you remember the video you made on the titans of King of the Monsters, there was an unseen kaiju with the WB logo that looked like a gryffin. This Mesopotamian demon looks just like it. What do you think of it?
That's known as a "lamassu" or "shedu." They represent zodiacs, stars, and constellations.
I was getting ready to add some citations from Variety, BoxOffice, et al. to a page using the Wikipedia template for magazine citations; I realized the reference links are broken when trying this because this Wiki doesn't have its own template for this category. It's too technical for me to attempt doing myself so I thought I'd mention it to someone with more experience creating pages, templates, etc.
I'd really like to be able to add these citations if possible. Of course, it also opens up the possibility to using issues of G-Fan, Japanese Giants, and other old fanzines. Anyway, in the meantime, should I just hold off on those edits and citations until a template is in place or should I go ahead and add them now? Thanks.
We need to make a template but for now you can add them manually or use the cite book template and put the ASIN or magazine code in the ISBN field. I'll talk to Titanollante about making an actual template for it.
More to the point -- why would our format for citing magazines look different from any other wiki? Do you actually understand what's being discussed?
magazine citations could be useful if anyone can find anything in Fox Kids for GTS.
